RESEARCH PAPER
Wild asparagus domestication for food/energy cropping system set up
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 10, Ancona, 60131, Italy
 
2
Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39/a, Sassari, 07100, Italy
 
3
Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia (AGRIS), Service of Environmental Studies, Crop Protection and Production Quality, Cagliari, Italy
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-09-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-10-06
 
 
Publication date: 2023-10-20
 
 
Corresponding author
Marco Cossu   

Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Italy
 
 
Int. Agrophys. 2023, 37(4): 415-424
 
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Solar greenhouses are mixed systems merging energy and crops on the same land unit
  • Wild asparagus cropping may represent a good option under these challenging systems
  • Plants showed a relevant physiological plasticity in response to light constraints
  • Neither roof type nor management significantly affected spears number and length
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The solar greenhouse sector is currently unbalanced towards energy production. Thus, the introduction of new crop options, such as wild asparagus, could contribute to the promotion of economic and environmental sustainability in these food/energy systems (mixed-systems). We hypothesized that wild asparagus is able to adapt both to sunny and partially shaded environments provided that both nutrient and water supply are guaranteed. Over a three-year experiment, we carried out an intensive examination of within-season phenological, physiological and productive dynamics under a greenhouse with 50% of the roof area covered with photovoltaic panels. Under the photovoltaic roof the net assimilation rate was on average 5 time lower, averaged over the growing seasons (0.6 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1), resulting in negative results for some monitoring dates. However, lower net assimilation rate did not negatively impact spears production in terms of number, length and diameter. The year of establishment affected the length of the spear, which was 4 cm shorter in 2013 than in 2014 and 2015, when no significant difference was observed. The novelty proposed in this study could be a successful option for farmers to promote production diversification and a promising strategy to guarantee the environmental and economic sustainability of the whole mixed system.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Dr. Stefania Solinas for helpful comments on the final draft of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the Murtas family and CIDAM s.s.a. farm staff for their longstanding support, Mr. Tore Pala, Mr. Marco Maxia and Dr. Giulia R. Urracci for their valuable help in collecting data.
FUNDING
The Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy) (grant number C04-1). Project RESTART, FSC 2014-2020 (CUP D66C18000260002) of the UniNuoro University Consortium and the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Italy); Project Innovagreen, FDS2017 of the Banco di Sardegna Foundation (CUP J85F20000360007); Project Atlantide (CUP J88D2000007000202) of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia; Project H2020 Solaqua “Accessible, reliable and affordable solar irrigation for Europe and beyond”, funded by the European Commission within Programme Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Call: H2020-LC-SC3-2020-RES-IA-CSA Project: 952879.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Aroca-Delgado R., Pérez-Alonso J., Callejón-Ferre Á.-J., and Díaz-Pérez M., 2019. Morphology, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato cultivation with flexible photovoltaic rooftop panels (Almería-Spain). Sci. Hortic., 257, 108768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scie....
 
2.
Bande M.M., Grenz J., Asio V.B., and Sauerborn J., 2013. Fiber yield and quality of abaca (Musa textilis var. Laylay) grown under different shade conditions, water and nutrient management. Ind. Crop. Prod., 42, 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indc....
 
3.
Benincasa P., Tei F., and Rosati A., 2007. Plant density and genotype effects on wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.) spear yield and quality. Hortscience, 42, 1163-1166. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTS....
 
4.
Bilušić T., Šola I., Rusak G., Poljuha D., and Čulić V.C., 2019. Antiproliferative and pro‐apoptotic activities of wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.), black bryony (Tamus communis L.) and butcher’s broom (Ruscus aculeatus L.) aqueous extracts against T24 and A549 cancer cell lines. J. Food Biochem., 43, e12781. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.1....
 
5.
Botha J., Witkowski E.T.F., and Cock J., 2005. A review of nurse-ries as conservation or social forestry outreach tools. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manage., 1, 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/174515....
 
6.
Cai Z.Q., 2011. Shade delayed flowering and decreased photosynthesis, growth and yield of Sacha Inchi (Plukenetia volubilis) plants. Ind. Crop. Prod., 34, 1235-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indc....
 
7.
Capilleri P.P., Motta E., and Raciti E., 2016. Experimental study on native plant root tensile strength for slope stabilization. Procedia Eng., 158, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proe....
 
8.
Ceccanti C., Landi M., Benvenuti S., Pardossi A., and Guidi L., 2018. Mediterranean wild edible plants or “new functional crops”. Molecules, 23, 2299. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecu....
 
9.
Cossu M., Sirigu A., Deligios P.A., Farci R., Carboni G., Urracci G., and Ledda L., 2021. Yield response and physiological adaptation of green bean to photovoltaic greenhouses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2....
 
10.
Fatnassi H., Poncet C., Bazzano M.M., Brun R., and Bertin N., 2015. A numerical simulation of the photovoltaic greenhouse microclimate. Sol. Energy, 120, 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sole....
 
11.
Feliciano D., 2019. A review on the contribution of crop diversification to Sustainable Development Goal 1 “No poverty” in different world regions. Sustainable Development, 27, 795-808. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.192....
 
12.
Feller C., and Müller A., 2018. The content of reserve carbohydrates in the crown of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) as a function of progressing senescence of fern. Acta Hortic., 1223, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaH....
 
13.
Fernie R.A., and Yan J., 2019. De novo domestication: an alternative route toward new crops for the future. Mol. Plant., 12, 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp....
 
14.
Gong W.Z., Jiang C.D., Wu Y.S., Chen H.H., Liu W.Y., and Yang W.Y., 2015. Tolerance vs. avoidance: two strategies of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings in response to shade in intercropping. Photosynthetica, 53, 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099....
 
15.
Gratani L., 2014. Plant phenotypic plasticity in response to environmental factors. Adv. Bot., 208747. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/2....
 
16.
Guo J., 2001. Physiological characters underpinning cultivar differences in spear yield of field-grown asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.). Dissertation, University of Cantebury.
 
17.
Katsenios N., Roussis Ie., Efthimiadou A., Kakabouki I., and Bilalis D., 2019. Seed treatment techniques to improve germination of wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.), a potential new crop. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo., 47, 995-1000. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4....
 
18.
Kavga A., Strati I.F., Sinanoglou V.J., Fotakis C., Sotiroudis G., Christodoulou P., and Zoumpoulakis P., 2019. Evaluating the experimental cultivation of peppers in low‐energy‐demand greenhouses. An interdisciplinary study. J. Sci. Food Agric., 99, 781-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9....
 
19.
Khalid M.H.B., Raza M.A., Yu H.Q., Sun F.A., Zhang Y.Y., Lu F.Z., Si L., Iqbal N., Khan I., Fu F.L., and Li W.C., 2019. Effect of shade treatments on morphology, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of soybeans (Glycine max L. MERR.). Appl. Ecol. Env. Res., 17, 2551-2569. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/....
 
20.
Kaska A., Deniz N., and Mammadov R., 2018. Biological activities of wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.). Int. J. Second. Metab., 3, 243-251. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.....
 
21.
Kittas C., Katsoulas N., Bartzanas T., and Bakker S., 2013. Greenhouse climate control and energy use. In: Good agricultural practices for greenhouse vegetable crops: principles for Mediterranean climate areas (Eds W. Baudoin, R. Nono-Womdim, N. Lutaladio, A. Hodder et al.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 63-96.
 
22.
Ledda L., 2010. Vegetable asparagus growing with low input techniques in Sardinia. In: Opportunities and constraints in the evaluation of local productions in Sardinia: asparagus (in Italian). (Eds M. Tedde, F. Nuvoli). Gallizzi Press, Sassari, 23-56.
 
23.
Lo Porto C., Sergio L., Boari F., Logrieco A.F., and Cantore V., 2019. Cold plasma pretreatment improves the germination of wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.) seeds. Sci. Hortic., 256, 108554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scie....
 
24.
Li H., Jiang D., Wollenweber B., Dai T., and Cao W., 2010. Effects of shading on morphology, physiology and grain yield of winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron., 33, 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.....
 
25.
Mantovani D., Rosati A., and Perrone D., 2019. Photosynthetic characterization and response to drought and temperature in wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.). Hortscience, 54, 1039-1043. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTS....
 
26.
Molina M., Pardo-de-Santayana M., García E., Aceituno-Mata L., Morales R., and Tardío J., 2012. Exploring the potential of wild food resources in the Mediterranean region: natural yield and gathering pressure of the wild asparagus (Asparagus acutifolius L.). Span. J. Agric. Res., 10, 1090-1100. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2....
 
27.
Nakayama H., Yamaguchi T., and Tsukaya H., 2013. Modification and co-option of leaf developmental programs for the acquisition of flat structures in monocots: unifacial leaves in Juncus and cladodes in Asparagus. Front. Plant Sci., 4, 248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2....
 
28.
Niinemets Ü., 2010. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol. Res., 25, 693-714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284....
 
29.
Pantera A., Burgess P.J., Mosquera Losada R., Moreno G., López-Díaz M.L, Corroyer N., McAdam J., Rosati A., Papadopoulos A.M., Graves A., Rigueiro Rodríguez A., Ferreiro-Domínguez N., Fernández Lorenzo J.L., González-Hernández M.P., Papanastasis V.P., Mantzanas K., Van Lerberghe P., and Malignier, N., 2018. Agroforestry for high value tree systems in Europe. Agroforest. Syst., 92, 945-959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457....
 
30.
Renard D., and Tilman D., 2019. National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature, 571, 257-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586....
 
31.
Rosati A., Pepe R., Senatore A., Perrone D., and Falavigna A., 2005. Productivity of wild asparagus (in Italian). Inf. Agrar., 8, 75-77. https://doi.org/10.17104/0017-....
 
32.
Savo V., Salomone F., Mattoni E., Tofani D., and Caneva G., 2019. Traditional salads and soups with wild plants as a source of antioxidants: a comparative chemical analysis of five species growing in Central Italy. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med., 6782472. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6....
 
33.
Schulp C.J.E., Thuiller W., and Verburg P.H., 2014. Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service. Ecol. Econ., 105, 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol....
 
34.
Taiz L., and Zeiger E., 2012. Photosynthesis: physiological and ecological considerations. In: Plant physiology (Eds L. Taiz, E. Zeiger). Sunderland: Sinauer, 173-179.
 
35.
Vialet-Chabrand S., Matthews J.S.A., Simkin A.J., Raines C.A., and Lawson T., 2017. Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiol., 173, 2163-2179. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.....
 
eISSN:2300-8725
ISSN:0236-8722
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top